Authorization Model for Representation in Homeowners' Meetings

It is mandatory to include the full identification of the owner and the representative, including ID, NIE, or passport.
The exact reference of the property (apartment, premises, garage) and its participation coefficient must be indicated.
The date, time, and nature of the meeting (ordinary or extraordinary) must be specified, along with the owner's signature and the date of issuance of the document.

No, under no circumstances is the personal appearance of the principal mandatory.
The representative themselves can deliver the document to the meeting table on behalf of the owner when the roll is called.
Advance electronic delivery to the community secretary's email is also fully valid, provided it guarantees the authenticity of the sender.

Yes, the eIDAS 2.0 digital identity framework consolidates the absolute value of electronic signatures.
An authorization signed with a qualified electronic signature is presumed to be intact and has the same legal effect as a handwritten signature throughout the European Union.

The omission of any mandatory requirement empowers the meeting table to reject the representative's accreditation.
Consequently, the participation quota of the absent owner will not be counted for the quorum, and their right to vote will be suppressed.

Yes, the mandate is based on the principle of free revocability at any time before or during the meeting.
The most common and incontrovertible form of revocation is the simple physical or electronic appearance of the delegating owner at the assembly, which nullifies the delegation by law.

The Court of Justice of the European Union establishes that co-owners act as "consumers".
If the provided model contains non-negotiated abusive clauses (such as generic waivers to challenge agreements or default voting instructions), these may be considered null under Directive 93/13/EEC.